<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Press Releases &#8211; Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria</title>
	<atom:link href="https://grumpytaxpayers.com/category/press-releases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://grumpytaxpayers.com</link>
	<description>Almost the Best Place on Earth </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">106214401</site>	<item>
		<title>Service-sharing report pulls punches: Province urged to step into the ring with Dysfunction-by-the-Sea</title>
		<link>https://grumpytaxpayers.com/2017/09/service-sharing-report-pulls-its-punches-province-urged-to-step-into-the-ring-with-dysfunction-by-the-sea/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team Grumpy Taxpayers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 15:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Get Involved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grumpytaxpayers.com/?p=1449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Taxpayers feeling pick-pocketed by their municipalities aren&#8217;t likely to get quick relief or better services, now that the province released its study on integrating services and governance. The long-awaited Capital Integrated Services and Governance Initiative (CISGI) examines 16 service areas, from police to housing to transportation. The facts and figures in the report support the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Taxpayers feeling pick-pocketed by their municipalities aren&#8217;t likely to get quick relief or better services, now that the province released its study on integrating services and governance.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>The long-awaited Capital Integrated Services and Governance Initiative (CISGI) examines 16 service areas, from police to housing to transportation. The facts and figures in the report support the belief that the current municipal governance and services model in the Capital region is broken and in crisis.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p><strong>&#8220;While dysfunctional local governance doesn&#8217;t have the attention of the fire, fentanyl or housing crisis,&#8221; says John Treleaven, 1st vice-chair of Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria, &#8220;it&#8217;s an huge issue and an ongoing, seemingly incurable set of problems that effect the daily lives of 383,500.&#8221;</strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><strong>The study is an indictment of the status quo that offers the public the proof needed for demanding the consolidation of one or more municipalities in the region, he says. Rusty and dated legislation underpinning municipal government must also be updated. </strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><strong>&#8220;The report&#8217;s recommendations are limp and without enforcement, as a result of the province&#8217;s terms of reference. The study though supports the argument that the province needs to abandon its hands-off approach to municipal affairs and to step up to the plate on behalf of the taxpayer,&#8221; says Treleaven.</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s common for residential and business residents to take an extra tax hit because of long term inaction by the CRD and municipalities.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Consider the example of &#8216;best practices&#8217; that are highlighted in the report such as an inter-municipal business licensing program, regional delivery of recreation services, and notably, joint procurement through an existing provincial system.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p><strong>&#8220;Saving big tax dollars with joint buying should already be standard practice in all local bureaucracies,&#8221; says Stan Bartlett, chair of Grumpy Taxpayer$.</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s unbelievable that after several generations of municipalities functioning and 50 years of the CRD operating, that a joint procurement process to save money and provide standardization has to be even mentioned.&#8221;</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>It&#8217;s a no-brainer that all local jurisdictions should collaborate on one-time purchases of services and equipment including fire trucks, ambulances, electric vehicles, LED street lighting, computer equipment, IT network services, general office products, and environmental services, he says.</p>
</div>
<div>&#8220;Continued incremental change in governance and shared services at a glacial speed is unfortunate,&#8221; says Bartlett. &#8220;The broken governance model results in a tremendous cost to taxpayers and the quality of service delivery in the region.&#8221;</div>
<div>
<p>To date there&#8217;s been no public discussion, debate or further action taken on the study&#8217;s recommendations by the CRD.</p>
</div>
<div><strong><br />
RELATED</strong></div>
<div><strong>Capital Integrated Services and Governance Initiative (CISGI),</strong> Community, Sport and Cultural Development, BC Ministry of March, 2016. <a href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ijqYi3jiexPk8p7I21QrE6vEwJveuefgFsfKPVcyE88hpwzl8nhsU99gD6aCFr--Tf_SN906RfSaBQCAdMnjsbKuy--dP8OsDSHP1d9B7Pf1IicMBKD9-QY1dp9pjDKnYiLllhvC6MNXXbaGGTnFvzTDXH7JCipNf80ME24z-xvjwle5F1L9Jv9BojbWRRVVeKFz0ib22DjUZCBF2y0sRA==&amp;c=LZcR3uQM1tZninMMYoe6uVAOGcL63ipjwB8LoMASn-uA4CQjLIBJ0g==&amp;ch=1D6tXtGXFYfAiPC60Aq_iAaNVGLw0kAcjFYlENVjcu8aKD_te5kzTg==" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" shape="rect" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f%3D001ijqYi3jiexPk8p7I21QrE6vEwJveuefgFsfKPVcyE88hpwzl8nhsU99gD6aCFr--Tf_SN906RfSaBQCAdMnjsbKuy--dP8OsDSHP1d9B7Pf1IicMBKD9-QY1dp9pjDKnYiLllhvC6MNXXbaGGTnFvzTDXH7JCipNf80ME24z-xvjwle5F1L9Jv9BojbWRRVVeKFz0ib22DjUZCBF2y0sRA%3D%3D%26c%3DLZcR3uQM1tZninMMYoe6uVAOGcL63ipjwB8LoMASn-uA4CQjLIBJ0g%3D%3D%26ch%3D1D6tXtGXFYfAiPC60Aq_iAaNVGLw0kAcjFYlENVjcu8aKD_te5kzTg%3D%3D&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1504799362277000&amp;usg=AFQjCNHamx2zdbhBhhrs62m03IlvRSahdQ">https://news.gov.bc.ca/<wbr />releases/2017MAH0002-001472</a></div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Region riddled with duplication,</strong> Times Colonist editorial, Sept. 2, 2017. <a href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ijqYi3jiexPk8p7I21QrE6vEwJveuefgFsfKPVcyE88hpwzl8nhsU99gD6aCFr--ZtP4VE-BinTAKPBggIImmnx9AZNMK0D8P8ReRB03kQUWD5NJevc3zJboWaLXZTOF2hfDAcujjCYfxONEK6J-7PDWrsEx3PZxKdlQ--X8TT59islwT_ncytRCP4MmTGAXN5xvZdog20JEbdIDYQFNvEhhXTSBxhXuSdJrFrnCcXVqNnenZFzdznJj7DYy19fW0tyw2Rdf4VbfM79PhhUMDQ==&amp;c=LZcR3uQM1tZninMMYoe6uVAOGcL63ipjwB8LoMASn-uA4CQjLIBJ0g==&amp;ch=1D6tXtGXFYfAiPC60Aq_iAaNVGLw0kAcjFYlENVjcu8aKD_te5kzTg==" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" shape="rect" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f%3D001ijqYi3jiexPk8p7I21QrE6vEwJveuefgFsfKPVcyE88hpwzl8nhsU99gD6aCFr--ZtP4VE-BinTAKPBggIImmnx9AZNMK0D8P8ReRB03kQUWD5NJevc3zJboWaLXZTOF2hfDAcujjCYfxONEK6J-7PDWrsEx3PZxKdlQ--X8TT59islwT_ncytRCP4MmTGAXN5xvZdog20JEbdIDYQFNvEhhXTSBxhXuSdJrFrnCcXVqNnenZFzdznJj7DYy19fW0tyw2Rdf4VbfM79PhhUMDQ%3D%3D%26c%3DLZcR3uQM1tZninMMYoe6uVAOGcL63ipjwB8LoMASn-uA4CQjLIBJ0g%3D%3D%26ch%3D1D6tXtGXFYfAiPC60Aq_iAaNVGLw0kAcjFYlENVjcu8aKD_te5kzTg%3D%3D&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1504799362277000&amp;usg=AFQjCNE_W9DQBgSU66c4fWs1qjFEhx628g">http://www.timescolonist.com/<wbr />opinion/editorials/editorial-<wbr />region-riddled-with-<wbr />duplication-1.22355019</a></div>
<div>
<p><strong>How many municipalities to change a light bulb?</strong> Greater Victoria Chamber of Commerce, Aug. 23, 2017.</p>
</div>
<div><strong>Taxes &#8211; the average Canadian family&#8217;s largest expense,</strong> Financial Post, Aug. 24, 2017.  <a href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ijqYi3jiexPk8p7I21QrE6vEwJveuefgFsfKPVcyE88hpwzl8nhsU5-6O1Za34BFtBAaylt38fTZ3nhcbXHD6YrpVLKr-iysv6E_hhqSInSIa-S3c5uiONIGq4R-I_cT46o6mVYVXPzdDHTsoZfsoRJ8oIUIibPiKQAB8_rZg1PRSqxidOYH2M9WNhgjpsfskPpA3hB1WVA_cDZ1AwANbIpITXANE2bqk9ST85cpqlaUQek6yCCVNdG0fhmosilFQRe2HAPhPcU=&amp;c=LZcR3uQM1tZninMMYoe6uVAOGcL63ipjwB8LoMASn-uA4CQjLIBJ0g==&amp;ch=1D6tXtGXFYfAiPC60Aq_iAaNVGLw0kAcjFYlENVjcu8aKD_te5kzTg==" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" shape="rect" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&amp;q=http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f%3D001ijqYi3jiexPk8p7I21QrE6vEwJveuefgFsfKPVcyE88hpwzl8nhsU5-6O1Za34BFtBAaylt38fTZ3nhcbXHD6YrpVLKr-iysv6E_hhqSInSIa-S3c5uiONIGq4R-I_cT46o6mVYVXPzdDHTsoZfsoRJ8oIUIibPiKQAB8_rZg1PRSqxidOYH2M9WNhgjpsfskPpA3hB1WVA_cDZ1AwANbIpITXANE2bqk9ST85cpqlaUQek6yCCVNdG0fhmosilFQRe2HAPhPcU%3D%26c%3DLZcR3uQM1tZninMMYoe6uVAOGcL63ipjwB8LoMASn-uA4CQjLIBJ0g%3D%3D%26ch%3D1D6tXtGXFYfAiPC60Aq_iAaNVGLw0kAcjFYlENVjcu8aKD_te5kzTg%3D%3D&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1504799362277000&amp;usg=AFQjCNG3VwHbIC4mSlQrSo9Jc97sCreObw">http://business.financialpost.<wbr />com/opinion/taxes-the-average-<wbr />canadian-familys-largest-<wbr />expense</a></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Grumpy Taxpayer$ is a non-profit, unaffiliated, non-partisan, citizen&#8217;s advocacy group dedicated to lower taxes, less waste, and more accountable municipal government. <a href="https://grumpytaxpayers.com/join-us/">DONATE &amp; JOIN US?</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1449</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tough 2017 municipal budget questions to ask your councillor</title>
		<link>https://grumpytaxpayers.com/2017/01/tough-budget-questions-to-ask-your-councillor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team Grumpy Taxpayers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2017 23:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grumpytaxpayers.com/?p=900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Better value for taxes urged by unflappable humanoids &#8211; This time of year you must have empathy for taxpayers, those unflappable humanoids who are normally florid-faced, calm, stoic, wiry, and immune to any privation. Then credit card statements arrive, along with the new property assessment, and several fatter utility bills. On top of that city [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Better value for taxes urged by unflappable humanoids &#8211; </strong><br />
This time of year you must have empathy for taxpayers, those unflappable humanoids who are normally florid-faced, calm, stoic, wiry, and immune to any privation.</p>
<p>Then credit card statements arrive, along with the new property assessment, and several fatter utility bills. On top of that city hall starts talking about big hikes to one of your largest bills of the year, dreaded property taxes.</p>
<p>The average Canadian family now spends more on taxes than housing, food and clothing combined with 42 per cent of income going to taxes, and 38 per cent being spent on the basic necessities of life. It&#8217;s likely a greater percentage here in the Victoria region, one of the highest cost of living areas in the country. All this before the CRD takes its generous cut, or the bills for sewage treatment or a new bridge, the two largest infrastructure projects in the region&#8217;s history.</p>
<p>With that in mind and a goal of better value for taxes, here&#8217;s a handy-dandy list of the Top 12 Budget Questions To Ask Your Councillor:</p>
<p><strong>1. How does this year&#8217;s tax increase compare to inflation?</strong> Inflation is running at about two per cent so municipalities shouldn&#8217;t be asking for any more than that. Otherwise it needs to be clearly justified preferably through public hearing or a referendum. How have tax increases for residents and business, compounded annually, compared to inflation and population growth during the past 10 years?</p>
<p><strong>2. Are you satisfied that you are sharing as many services as you can with neighbouring municipalities?</strong> What about joint procurements? Ask why the blazes 13 jurisdictions aren&#8217;t collaborating on payroll services for example? Demand municipalities work with the CRD to create a common procurement system to save tax dollars and improve services.</p>
<p><strong>3. What percentage of the budget covers personnel costs and is that static or has it changed in recent years?</strong> It&#8217;s well known civic employees are generously compensated, far more than the private sector. Urge the municipality to press the province to develop compensation guidelines and regulations to prevent municipalities from poaching staff from one another and driving up wages.</p>
<p><strong>4. What&#8217;s the bottom line?</strong> If you&#8217;re a City of Victoria or Saanich taxpayer &#8211; everyone supports the Capital Regional District, the Capital Regional Housing Corporation and Capital Regional Hospital District Board &#8211; the budget documents each weigh in at about 1,000 pages. Where are the two or three page financial statements and the summation? Most taxpayers don&#8217;t have the time, inclination or interest in rummaging through confusing door-stoppers.</p>
<p><strong>5. Does council know the ground has shifted?</strong> Budget documents are prepared months in advance and local, provincial, national and international economic forces can change dramatically. A three per cent tax increase may have been justified then, but not now after the climate of economic uncertainty around the world, particularly in Canada and the U.S., after the American election. Now, the B.C. government will be required to hire hundreds of teachers and spend between $250-million and $300 million more e-a-c-h year on education, after the dramatic win by B.C. teachers in the Supreme Court of Canada. That huge annual shortfall comes out of your other pocket.</p>
<p><strong>6. Why tax increases in a booming economy?</strong> Much of the region is experiencing economic growth not seen in 25 years. Sure costs go up, but with a windfall in additional tax revenue &#8211; along with increased assessment and a broader tax base &#8211; how can council justify increasing taxes so much?</p>
<p><strong>7. Does your council know the Victoria region has a very high cost of living?</strong> It&#8217;s well established this part of the country has one of the highest costs of living in Canada. It&#8217;s even more so this past year, as housing costs have escalated dramatically driving up such fixed costs such as insurance and mortgage payments. Remind them.</p>
<p><strong>8. Don&#8217;t we own any assets?</strong> Is it worth selling some land or physical assets to moderate tax increases or dipping into the cash in that rainy day fund&#8217;?</p>
<p><strong>9. What about the debt side of the ledger?</strong> Nobody talks about the debt even though the region collectively owe a staggering half billion dollars by end of Dec. 2015 That&#8217;s before (local share of the) $765-million sewer treatment project and the $105-million plus bridge replacement in Victoria. Can your municipality support any more increased debt?</p>
<p><strong>10. What is your council doing to encourage economic health and development?</strong> Prosperity and taxes are also created through nurturing business (which pays up to eight times the multiple of residential taxpayers). What is its plan and how much of the budget is contributed to specific goals?</p>
<p><strong>11. Why isn&#8217;t &#8216;Zero-Based Budgeting&#8217; applied to our municipal departments?</strong> Government tends to keep on growing unless councils refocus their mandates and goals in a rigorous, disciplined fashion. Instead of automatically adding a percentage increase every year in the budget, councillors need to start from zero. Every expenditure needs to be scrutinized and determined to be necessary to do a task. Start by zero base budgeting one municipal department every year.</p>
<p><strong>12. Ask directors at the CRD to justify the proposed average 8 per cent rate hike.</strong> Esquimalt and the West Shore taxpayers face double digit increases this year, and the total budget is expected to soar 8 per cent. Ask your councillor if the orgy of infrastructure projects are necessary or can they be scaled back?</p>
<p>Reprint this Opinion Column with credit to Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria please.<br />
Available for Media Interviews:</p>
<p>Stan Bartlett, Chair, Grumpy Taxpayer$<br />
grumpytaxpayers@telus.net<br />
250-477-9907</p>
<p>John Treleaven, 1st Vice-chair, Grumpy Taxpayer$<br />
treleavengroup@shaw.ca<br />
250.656.7899, cell 250.588.7899</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">900</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BRIEF: Top 10 ways to improve capital region governance</title>
		<link>https://grumpytaxpayers.com/2016/08/top-10-ways-to-improve-capital-region-governance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team Grumpy Taxpayers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grumpytaxpayers.com/?p=628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Grumpy Taxpayer$ releases brief with recommendations to the province calling for a major overhaul of the CRD VICTORIA &#8211; Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria releases today its brief &#8216;Top 10 Ways to Improve Capital Region Governance&#8217; to the province calling for a major overhaul of a dysfunctional Capital Regional District (CRD). The CRD, an organization [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Grumpy Taxpayer$ releases brief with recommendations to the province calling for a major overhaul of the CRD</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">VICTORIA &#8211; Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria releases today its brief &#8216;Top 10 Ways to Improve Capital Region Governance&#8217; to the province calling for a major overhaul of a dysfunctional Capital Regional District (CRD).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The CRD, an organization designed 50 years ago, is unfortunately held in low regard both by taxpayers, and somewhat surprisingly, elected municipal mayors and councillors.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">&#8220;The CRD is either broken or working as intended,&#8221; says John Treleaven, 1st Vice-chair of Grumpy Taxpayer$. &#8220;In both cases it has failed to make the expectation of the needs of a provincial capital region and one of Canada&#8217;s largest urban centres,&#8221; says John Treleaven, 1st Vice-chair of Grumpy Taxpayer$.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">&#8220;The need for the province to take over the sewage treatment project is the most recent evidence of systemic failure &#8211; a form of administrative receivership &#8211; as well as its failure to resolve regional transportation issues.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The CRD requires fundamental improvements in accountability and transparency. Among the 10 recommendations from Grumpy Taxpayer$:<br />
The Community Charter be amended to allow for the direct election of the chair and directors of the Capital Regional District through a ward system.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">A detailed governance review of the structure and function of the CRD is recommended with a commitment to implement necessary changes. This review would include an internal review of all areas of responsibility of the board and core mandate of the organization with the view to consolidating and streamlining.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Our foremost recommendation is to urge the government of British Columbia to create a dedicated Ministry of Municipal Affairs to provide leadership and a support role for municipal and regional government. As well, we urge the newly created ministry initiate a review and update of the Community Charter (Bill 14, 2003).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Grumpy Taxpayer$ is also urging a reduced board size of 12, a modified oath of allegiance and two-term limits for CRD directors.</p>
<p>Our brief attached below will form part of the documentation to the Capital Integration Services and Governance Initiative (CISGI) which will be making its initial report to the province in October.<br />
<strong>CLICK BELOW TO READ THE COMPLETE EIGHT-PAGE BRIEF:</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://grumpytaxpayers.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CISGI-Brief-.pdf">CISGI Brief</a></p>
<p><strong>Editors Note:</strong> Listen to Terry Moore (McCall on holidays) of CFAX radio interview John Treleaven, 1st Vice-chair of Grumpy$ and discuss CRD governance (Aug. 15).</p>
<p>https://soundcloud.com/pamela-mccall-cfax/august-15-2pm?in=pamela-mccall-cfax/sets/pamela-mccall</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">628</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capital Region needs some strong medicine</title>
		<link>https://grumpytaxpayers.com/2016/06/region-needs-some-strong-medicine/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team Grumpy Taxpayers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Get Involved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://50.87.55.182/~grumpyt5/?p=447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Governance and service integration study demands bold action plus taxpayer input to improve municipal services  VICTORIA &#8211; Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria loudly applauds the province for moving to improve municipal services, but argues that bold action bolstered by public input will be needed to make much-needed changes to a badly broken system. The province recently [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Governance and service integration study demands bold action plus taxpayer input</strong><strong> </strong><strong>to improve municipal services</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p>VICTORIA &#8211; Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria loudly applauds the province for moving to improve municipal services, but argues that bold action bolstered by public input will be needed to make much-needed changes to a badly broken system.</p>
<p>The province recently announced that two companies &#8211; Circle Square Solutions and Urban Systems &#8211; will work with the bigwigs in the 13 municipal governments and the Capital Regional District (CRD) to make recommendations to explore ways to integrate services and governance in the capital region. The report is due in October.</p>
<p>&#8220;The road to stalemate is often paved with good intentions and studies,&#8221; says Stan Bartlett, chairperson of Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria. &#8220;Where the study makes clear recommendations, bold action will be needed to improve the badly broken 50-year-old CRD.&#8221;</p>
<p>Taxpayers have dealt with municipalities and the CRD on many levels for decades, and every year at this time they also must send a cheque to the municipal office, says Bartlett.</p>
<p>&#8220;A taxpayer&#8217;s experience has not always been positive and they may have legitimate ideas on how to integrate services and improve governance. It would also be helpful, not to mention good politics, if the public supports any changes,&#8221; says Bartlett.</p>
<p><strong>Grumpy Taxpayer$ urges the Capital Integration Services and Governance Initiative recommend:  a separately elected chair and directors at the CRD, an oath of office to reflect regional responsibilities, term limits for directors, and streamlining the 220 plus programs the CRD manages.</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><strong>Importantly, the creation of a &#8216;Ministry of Municipal Affairs&#8217; solely dedicated to addressing municipal issues would facilitate making these changes. </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><strong>In short, we advocate a renewed CRD that&#8217;s open, accountable and transparent. It needs to be designed with the power to carry out clear responsibilities for the optimal operation of the region.</strong></p>
<p>Despite the tight five-month time frame for the study, public hearings and written submissions should be welcomed.</p>
<p>Hiring a firm headed by former BC Liberal cabinet minister George Abbott is an inspired choice by the province, says Bartlett. He&#8217;s a well-respected former minister of community, aboriginal and women&#8217;s services and worked with the Union of BC Municipalities to pass the Community Charter, one of the main underpinnings of local government.</p>
<p>Grumpy Taxpayer$ calls for all the region&#8217;s taxpayers to send along ideas on improving municipal services to George Abbott, c/o Circle Square Solutions and Urban Systems, both located in Victoria.</p>
<p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Consultants chosen to facilitate work on governance and service integration,  <a href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001mHgDG2mzfQrvh2Sbw6MHqF3IeHaB87KI1EzgaMckDBQn0LgfLTVLGUYwttlDMBT-_GUtQjUHcynE-szJ7YLzr7JyCkRljWTpIJxnPKBfzpR6Mye9HiSPF3ZiRznQIbLCl_MZmGiaCkyGV1IznFRcFoWs0bMLRwjjF6U6qQYU01-8Qx06duI68YPMUCEqBzfUay6XTBOwcMdMI8kUTotA3Q==&amp;c=&amp;ch=">https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2016CSCD0028-000910</a></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><strong>&#8216;Municipalities need expert help&#8217; (May 29) and &#8216;Dancing around amalgamation&#8217; (June 3), Times Colonist editorials</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">447</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax me, I&#8217;m a South Islander !</title>
		<link>https://grumpytaxpayers.com/2016/04/tax-me-im-a-south-islander/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team Grumpy Taxpayers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2016 16:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Regional District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Island]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://50.87.55.182/~grumpyt5/?p=240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Relentless escalation in property taxes set to continue &#8211;   April 8, 2016 &#8211; Is the tax load fair and reasonable? Are you getting good value for your property taxes? Are you happy as a clam about you property tax rate increases this spring? During the past 14 years, depending on where you live in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table id="content_LETTER.BLOCK22" border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="Content" colspan="1" rowspan="1" align="center" valign="top">
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong>Relentless escalation in property taxes set to continue &#8211;</strong><br />
<strong> </strong></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">April 8, 2016 &#8211; Is the tax load fair and reasonable? Are you getting good value</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">for your property taxes? Are you happy as a clam about you property tax rate increases this spring?</div>
<div style="text-align: left;"></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">During the past 14 years, depending on where you live in the capital region,</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">taxes for general municipal purposes increased relentlessly anywhere from</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">16 per cent in the Highlands, to 120 per cent in Victoria and 260 per cent in Sooke.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;"></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Tax increases for an average house across the Capital Regional District</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">continue to far exceed inflation. It’s a trend that will continue if municipal politicians approve tax rate increases this spring that range from two to</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">three to four hundred per cent more than current inflation.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;"></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Since 2002 national inflation has increased by 26 per cent, a Stats Canada calculation based on what it would cost to buy a basket of goods/services</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">14 years ago compared to 2015. While municipal administrators and</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">politicians point out they don’t buy milk or bread, the taxpayer does and</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">they are the ones who are able or unable to pay for administrators’ salaries</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">and other municipal services. CPP, OAS and many pension plans or wages</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">are adjusted regularly based on this number.</div>
</div>
<div align="justify">
<div>
<p style="text-align: left;">CLICK ON CHART TO ENLARGE &gt;&gt;</p>
</div>
</div>
<div align="justify">
<table class="OneColumnMobile" width="560" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="none" data-padding-converted="true">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="1" rowspan="1" width="100%">
<div align="center"><a class="imgCaptionAnchor" href="http://files.ctctcdn.com/ffd90173501/6545acd6-6de7-4a88-bd8a-1ba3f37b2cd2.pdf?ver=1458055749000" target="_blank" shape="rect"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://mlsvc01-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/ffd90173501/514bc788-c2a3-4356-a4a2-17553fa3d7eb.png" alt="" width="560" height="448" name="ACCOUNT.IMAGE.72" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="0" /></a></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="OneColumnMobile" width="572" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="none" data-padding-converted="true">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="1" rowspan="1" width="100%">
<div align="center"><a class="imgCaptionAnchor" href="http://files.ctctcdn.com/ffd90173501/6545acd6-6de7-4a88-bd8a-1ba3f37b2cd2.pdf?ver=1458055749000" target="_blank" shape="rect"><img decoding="async" src="https://mlsvc01-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/ffd90173501/79e8f29d-0297-40aa-b3de-a506527884ff.png" alt="" width="572" name="ACCOUNT.IMAGE.73" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="0" /></a></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div align="justify">If you&#8217;re a business the tax burden is even greater as business typically pay</div>
<div align="justify">a multiple of the rates paid by resident property owners. Typically business</div>
<div align="justify">pays a multiple between two and three, but it may go higher, as is the case</div>
<div align="justify">with North Saanich at 4.89 times.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;" align="justify">
<p><strong>What&#8217;s the evidence?</strong> Data was obtained from the Ministry of Community Sport &amp; Cultural Development, Schedule 704, Taxes and Charges on a Representative House (see below). The figures are for property taxes for general municipal services only &#8211; taxes collected for regional, hospital &amp; school districts and for transit are not included.  General municipal taxes are the property taxes that are under the direct and total control of municipal councils.</p>
<div><a href="http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/tax_rates/tax_rates2015.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect">http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/tax_rates/tax_rates2015.htm</a></div>
</div>
<div align="justify">
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>What&#8217;s an average house?</strong> A so-called representative house value (average house) is arrived at by dividing the total general municipal assessment value for land and improvements for all single-family residential subclass of properties by the number of such properties.  This value is close to the &#8216;average value&#8217; used by municipal authorities when they inform the public how much taxes on an &#8216;average house&#8217; will increase in any particular year.</p>
</div>
<div align="justify">
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>How about validity?</strong> The province does a breakdown for single family homes and does not include condos (which would skew the Victoria numbers to some extent). However as far as the rate of increase for taxes, it should be similar because the same mill rate (tax rate) applies for all residential properties &#8211; the only difference would be the general increase in home values (condos versus houses) that would occur over time.  If, over time, condos did not rise in value in a particular municipality as houses did, the rate of increase for condos might be lower (say for instance, it the general value of condos trended lower in relation to houses).  But, the representative house taxes are still a good indicator of tax increases.</p>
</div>
<div align="justify">
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Why are some tax increases so high?</strong> There are reasons why taxes in some municipalities may seem to increase by an exceptional amount.  For instance, Sooke implemented secondary sewage treatment during this period on their own (with no involvement by the CRD).  Alternatively, sewage treatment costs for the Peninsula municipalities was done through the CRD, hence are not reflected in their Peninsula municipal property tax bills.  Central Saanich and View Royal recently built large new fire halls, which may account for increases in those two municipalities.</p>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;" align="justify">
<p>A factor that can mitigate tax increases is a growing housing market (more new houses, with street, sewage and water infrastructure provided by developers) which can ease tax increases for all residential taxpayers.</p>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;" align="justify">
<p>Municipalities are required to provide this tax related data to the province annually. Figures include both capital and operating costs over the 2002 to 2015 term. They are a reliable means of tracking trends of municipal (and other) property taxes.</p>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;" align="justify"><strong>Sources:<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>Consumer Price Index, 1996-2015, Statistics Canada</strong></div>
<div align="justify">
<div>
<p>http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/econ46a-eng.htm</p>
</div>
</div>
<div align="justify">
<div>
<div align="justify">
<p><strong>Local Government tax rates and assessments 2015,</strong></p>
<div>BC Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development.<br />
<a href="http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/tax_rates/tax_rates2015.htm" target="_blank" shape="rect">http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/tax_rates/tax_rates2015.htm</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify">
<p><strong>MEDIA CONTACTS:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Stan Bartlett, Chair</strong><br />
grumpytaxpayers@telus.net<br />
250.477.9907, cell 250.507.4394</p>
<p><strong>John Treleaven, 1st Vice-chair</strong><br />
treleavengroup@shaw.ca<br />
250.656.7899, cell 250.588.7899</p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="Logo OuterText" colspan="1" rowspan="1" align="center" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">240</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Municipal budgets receive less scrutiny</title>
		<link>https://grumpytaxpayers.com/2016/04/municipal-budgets-receive-less-scrutiny-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team Grumpy Taxpayers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 21:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://50.87.55.182/~grumpyt5/?p=136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last year 6,339 regional homeowners defer property taxes &#8211; March, 2016 &#8211; Increased use of the province&#8217;s property tax deferral program by thousands of local homeowners results in unintended consequences such as less scrutiny of municipal government costs, says the advocacy group Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria. In 2015 some 6,339 taxpayers &#8211; about equivalent [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Last year 6,339 regional homeowners defer property taxes &#8211;<br />
</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><strong>March, 2016 &#8211;</strong> Increased use of the province&#8217;s property tax deferral program by thousands of local homeowners results in unintended consequences such as less scrutiny of municipal government costs, says the advocacy group Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria.</p>
<div>
<div>
<p><strong>In 2015 some 6,339 taxpayers &#8211; about equivalent to the number of dwelling units in Fairfield &#8211; deferred $22.2-million in property taxes in the 13 jurisdictions of the Capital Regional District (CRD), according to a freedom of information request filed with the B.C. Ministry of Finance.</strong></p>
<p>Since 2010 deferrals has increased by 25 per cent and the dollar value has increased by 35 per cent. With taxes in the Capital region often exceeding inflation by two or three or four hundred per cent, house prices increasing, and the population aging, it&#8217;s expected the tax deferral program will only increase in popularity.</p>
<p>The three largest participants in the program last year are Saanich with 2,089 deferrals ($7.4-million), City of Victoria with 1,190 deferrals ($4-million), and Oak Bay with 701 deferrals ($3.5-million), according to the B.C. Ministry of Finance.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p><strong>&#8220;Without doubt the property tax deferral program is an excellent initiative for many seniors,&#8221; says Stan Bartlett, Chairperson of Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria, &#8220;But there are unintended consequences.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Big tax increases are out of sight and out of mind for many homeowners. <strong><strong>When the big bill isn&#8217;t payable for 10 or 20 years</strong>, why bother growling at your councillor or city hall about excessive taxes?&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>When seniors and others can defer taxes it gives councils and administrations reason to continue to increase taxes well above inflation year after year,  says Bartlett.</p>
<p>Of the three levels of taxation in B.C., only one program allows taxpayers to borrow an amount owed on taxes at a sub-prime rate. Grumpy Taxpayer$ asks these questions: Why is the program necessary?  Is the problem the property assessment process? Does it result in a weakening of the accountability structure around local government?</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>&#8220;Tax deferrals may seem like an act of kindness by government, but results in taxpayer apathy and municipalities continued failure not to get costs under control. Some taxpayers are only able to pay their taxes by effectively getting a lien on their property, and passing the burden onto the next generation with exaggerated costs,&#8221; says Bartlett.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p>The unintended consequences of what is a fundamentally a good program are unfortunate &#8211; politicians know there will be less backlash against big tax increases. The increased popularity of the deferral program has eliminated some of the checks and balances critical for effective municipal government.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Many taxpayers defer taxes because they are property-rich, but cash-poor seniors who want to stay in their home. Others, want to take advantage of low-interest money that&#8217;s available without a means test. The province underwrites the program, a bill paid for by all taxpayers.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>You qualify on your principle residence for the program if you are 55 or older, a surviving spouse of any age or a person with disabilities at 0.85 per cent simple interest (non compounding). As well, families with children qualify under a higher interest program if you&#8217;re a parent, step-parent or financially supporting a child. Applicants must have and maintain a minimum equity of 25% of the property&#8217;s assessed value. A lien is registered against the property and the loan with interest is paid back when it&#8217;s sold.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><strong>Defer your taxes</strong>, B.C. Department of Finance <a href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001fPn1ltMUa114BWp6PtkEOJodpH5W5oeOxr931FZArNj_5-hDbyRBtPvuJYCssvWVHiU5pSk8QmBpiS5fwyjCIVA6dp5ngh5Lqqojw0pq7CrzAJ3daHwUOyhDcTF4Q9VzK5xprMr7ilaZN-tUUrYhTpseF2pN2HK1LOwfcMuKRVcSCccNFFEBM2B0LUxuzSd67o6wLGAWksncKCuOIK0HJpm9B73qiI07sdtMyKe6cwHrWFb8LU7rSQd_1OQDpnge6mFVL8KDmKz6_gy4oR1L4A==&amp;c=e79MpK6qi85Ok3KHypsVoNQreeDMoQUJ1wU67ZXi64CI4BZRg2de_g==&amp;ch=gC0KI9HHUrkt3BsVOFssfWdqpHZwoNQSLMd900wTCeZr_SuM_1kQ4Q==" target="_blank" shape="rect">http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/<wbr />content/taxes/property-taxes/<wbr />annual-property-tax/pay/defer-<wbr />taxes</a></p>
</div>
<div><strong>Defer Taxes, make money,</strong> CBC News B.C., Jan. 6, 2015</div>
<div>
<p><a href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001fPn1ltMUa114BWp6PtkEOJodpH5W5oeOxr931FZArNj_5-hDbyRBtPvuJYCssvWVT8MN3cZkCoiJ4x1LDU6oMeD_M_gxEvTzkDWaur61fC1HpDKgUguyE1lN0hmKXqTnahDh5bjpenE1kMqSlxLlU_AL8GUjnzLByM8TLvG-dKF-JpKLDYrG3dkBoBOS1CqVI0vSi66ygt0ieDDbEDsXCmXbWP3h9uqmQEjp5_iCkJEUTx-zqpYyHBr433jJlk0EmkLNFPR7xSoDuEPImz44gw==&amp;c=e79MpK6qi85Ok3KHypsVoNQreeDMoQUJ1wU67ZXi64CI4BZRg2de_g==&amp;ch=gC0KI9HHUrkt3BsVOFssfWdqpHZwoNQSLMd900wTCeZr_SuM_1kQ4Q==" target="_blank" shape="rect">http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/<wbr />british-columbia/property-tax-<wbr />deferral-michael-geller-1.<wbr />3391775</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><strong>MEDIA CONTACTS:</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Stan Bartlett, Chair</strong></div>
<div><a href="mailto:grumpytaxpayers@telus.net" target="_blank">grumpytaxpayers@telus.net</a></div>
<div>
<p><a href="tel:250.477.9907" target="_blank">250.477.9907</a>, cell <a href="tel:250.507.4394" target="_blank">250.507.4394</a></p>
</div>
<div><strong>John Treleaven, 1st Vice-chair</strong></div>
<div><a href="mailto:treleavengroup@shaw.ca" target="_blank">treleavengroup@shaw.ca</a></div>
<div><a href="tel:250.656.7899" target="_blank">250.656.7899</a>, cell <a href="tel:250.588.7899" target="_blank">250.588.7899</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">136</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
